Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He\u2019s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he\u2019s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-11/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Jowi Morales Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
jp7189 So, the question has to be asked: how accurate is grokopedia. Wikipedia has had problems with inaccuracies from folks intentionally messing with articles, and it's been used for AI reference material. Is grokopedia actually worse? The article is correct that retraining on inaccurate data can cause a snowball effect, but there are plenty of examples of the opposite happening; using AI to clean up bad data to make training better. Reply
Dementoss Admin said: ChatGPT has been found to be citing Grok in some of its answers, returning recursive results that risks spreading hallucinated or incorrect information. The spreading of hallucinated or incorrect information, has been the bread and butter of AI services from the start… Reply
LordVile Dementoss said: The spreading of hallucinated or incorrect information, has been the bread and butter of AI services from the start… Remember, you can use glue to stop your cheese sliding off pizza Reply
nimbulan jp7189 said: So, the question has to be asked: how accurate is grokopedia. Wikipedia has had problems with inaccuracies from folks intentionally messing with articles, and it's been used for AI reference material. Is grokopedia actually worse? The article is correct that retraining on inaccurate data can cause a snowball effect, but there are plenty of examples of the opposite happening; using AI to clean up bad data to make training better. Even the best LLMs can reach maybe 90% accuracy from the information I've read. Accuracy is worse when topics are more complex or technical. AI's training on AI-generated content (which is quickly taking over the internet) will just amplify accuracy errors. The only thing they could do is obviously flag AI-generated content so it gets automatically excluded from training material, but that would also inform users about what content is AI-generated, which they don't want to do. Reply
thisisaname LordVile said: Remember, you can use glue to stop your cheese sliding off pizza. Iron nails work better. You get some iron in your diet and less nasty chemicals on your pizza. :ROFLMAO: :giggle: Reply
thisisaname When everything in the internet is from LLM AI where will they go to find new content to steal reference🤯 Reply
Mr Marc G Wikipedia is notoriously inaccurate. Scientists who have tried to update articles on their own work get their edits rejected by the wiki gatekeepers. I'd frankly trust Grok much more than wilipedia. That being said, I never trust any AI for anything important. It has no discernment. And sources like Wikipedia and the msm are very often purposefully inaccurate to support editorial narrative. Reply
hotaru251 jp7189 said: how accurate is grokopedia. i mean its elon's grok…the same thing that regularly gets "fixed" when it states stuff he doesnt like. So its likely accurate about a lot of stuff (same for wikipedia) but on touchy/hot topics its likely biased (again like wikipedia) Reply
rblowery This is my fear with all AI models. Once AI models rely on another AI model for information the propensity for error increases dramatically. The dreaded AI Echo chamber. I had this very conversation with Grok yesterday. Grok has become more accurate again, after losing accuracy for about 6 months. I pay for Super Grok, and I would hope it's accurate. But, not always. It IS always confident that it's answer is accurate. Even when it is not even close to accurate. I am building complex tax VBA for Roth Conversion software using Excel then I'll port to python. Grok makes coding errors, but doesn't always recognize the error. I've learned to see what it is missing, tell it what it missed, and typically after a few tries we get it right. Much quicker then writing the VBA functions myself. But those incorrect functions are likely coming from snippets of code from other AI. Grok sees this line of code repeated numerous times, assumes it's correct, and feeds it back to me. It failes to compile, we work out the failed code. Again this results on lightening fast VBA coding. I was able to code all 50 states tax code in less than 48hrs. But, I do worry that Grok will get less effective again as AI takes over 90% of all new information posted to the web. It is a problem that must be handled. We must have genuine human data. hotaru251 said: i mean its elon's grok…the same thing that regularly gets "fixed" when it states stuff he doesnt like. So its likely accurate about a lot of stuff (same for wikipedia) but on touchy/hot topics its likely biased (again like wikipedia) Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/chatgpt-found-to-be-sourcing-data-from-ai-generated-content-popular-llm-uses-content-from-grokipedia-as-source-for-more-obscure-queries#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com
- Jensen laments buying Mercedes for his parents with Nvidia stock that would be worth $1.33 billion today — founder cashed out some stock after 1999 IPO to buy h
- Get rid of that ancient thermal paste with Arctic's MX-6, which just hit an all-time low price at Amazon — a cheap fix for what could turn into an expensive pro
- $3,000 RTX 5090 delivery brings rocks, a towel, and broken dreams — unboxing nightmare on an expensive GPU bought from Amazon Resale
- NVIDIA Unveils Multi-Agent Intelligent Warehouse and Catalog Enrichment AI Blueprints to Power the Retail Pipeline
- HyperX Cloud Alpha 2 Wireless Review: 250-hour battery life and simultaneous dual-wireless connectivity
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.