Some of you might still point to rising DRAM prices, and while that's a fair assumption, the issue isn't jacking up prices after these orders; it's that the brand outright cancelled them all. Corsair doesn't sell memory to AI data centers; its entire business is consumer-facing, so it lives and dies on reputation, which has now been tainted.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Hassam Nasir Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
moon2 However, the onus is on Corsair, since it still listed the kit at that price, mistake or not, which means the company had to honor the sale once the product was in the customer's cart and had passed checkout No they don't. You need to understand the difference between forming a contract and an invitation to treat. It's bad enough when people *assume* this is true, but it's worse when a normally trusted source repeats this as if it were true. There's no onus on any company to follow through with a sale for mispriced items. They may choose to do so, or they may choose to refund the transaction instead, or they may offer alternative options in lieu of those which the consumer may prefer (for example a refund and a discount code for money off in future). Don't make nonsense claims they "had to honour the sale, mistake or not". No-one does. Not in the US*, not in the UK, not in Europe and presumably not anywhere else of note. * At least federally. The onus is on someone else to confirm all relevant state law :p Reply
Ogotai moon2 said: No they don't. You need to understand the difference between forming a contract and an invitation to treat. It's bad enough when people *assume* this is true, but it's worse when a normally trusted source repeats this as if it were true. There's no onus on any company to follow through with a sale for mispriced items. They may choose to do so, or they may choose to refund the transaction instead, or they may offer alternative options in lieu of those which the consumer may prefer (for example a refund and a discount code for money off in future). Don't make nonsense claims they "had to honour the sale, mistake or not". No-one does. Not in the US*, not in the UK, not in Europe and presumably not anywhere else of note. * At least federally. The onus is on someone else to confirm all relevant state law :p you, might want to reconsider this… cause according to this you could be wrong…. corsair has to honor the price, if some one has paid for it, and are just waiting for it to be shipped. its no different then if you went to a store, saw a price for an item, went to the check out, and the price at check out, was higher then the price that is listed on the shelf, you would still be paying the lower price…. Reply
moon2 Ogotai said: you, might want to reconsider this… cause according to this you could be wrong…. corsair has to honor the price, if some one has paid for it, and are just waiting for it to be shipped. its no different then if you went to a store, saw a price for an item, went to the check out, and the price at check out, was higher then the price that is listed on the shelf, you would still be paying the lower price…. Could you link to a specific site? Your example is also incorrect. This is the scenario typically used to describe why the shop does not have to honor the (incorrect) price you saw if it actually rings up to a higher value at the till. Here's your example scenario, but handled correctly: https://legalclarity.org/does-a-store-have-to-honor-the-wrong-price/ Reply
Ogotai moon2 said: Could you link to a specific site? Your example is also incorrect. This is the scenario typically used to describe why the shop does not have to honor the (incorrect) price you saw if it actually rings up to a higher value at the till. Here's your example scenario, but handled correctly: https://legalclarity.org/does-a-store-have-to-honor-the-wrong-price/ most stores here, honor the price as it is on the display, not at the time of check out… ive even had it happen to me a few times… went back to where i got it from, took a pic, showed the cashier, and they called a manager to over ride the price… do no, my example is correct Reply
moon2 There's a difference between optionally choosing to sell at the mis-marked price and being legally required to do so. They shop did not have to do what they did. It's nice they sold at the mismarked price Reply
Gururu They all have policies on the matter. Corsair section 3. This is part of the contract. Reply
wujj123456 Legally speaking, I don't think they have to, but the law is the minimal requirement of doing business. I think it's reasonable for consumers to expect that they can rely on the price they see when putting down an order. Taking back an advertised price will surely have some chilling effect. I personally would shop less or leave entirely if I can't reliably calculate my cost on the spot, or have my orders cancelled later and thus delaying my purchase. Now consider that $240 is enough for a 96GB kit back in September. It's not like the company is giving it out for almost free and going to break over this. The predictable PR risk is totally not worth it, but they decided to take their chances because of greed. Reply
TheyStoppedit Ogotai said: you, might want to reconsider this… cause according to this you could be wrong…. corsair has to honor the price, if some one has paid for it, and are just waiting for it to be shipped. its no different then if you went to a store, saw a price for an item, went to the check out, and the price at check out, was higher then the price that is listed on the shelf, you would still be paying the lower price…. This is a misanalogy. It's more like…. you went to a store, saw a price for an item, went to check out, you checked out, your card approved, receipt prints, and the store owner decides: You know what…. I've changed my mind, I think it's worth more than that. The store has two options at that point: a) Give you the merchandise, b) Refund you the money. The store must do one of those two things, but they can choose which one. The store refunds the money, then puts the product back on the shelf at a higher price. They are allowed to do that. You have been made whole. You aren't out anything. Your total loss is $0.00. They haven't stolen from you or ripped you off. They refunded you every penny you paid. They can do that. Reply
jwnm moon2 said: * At least federally. The onus is on someone else to confirm all relevant state law :p The states I have lived in and have owned retail stores require that a merchant honor the marked price. At least back during the 80s and 90s. State laws change like toilet paper rolls though so what it is now is up for debate. Reply
valthuer This whole mess isn’t about whether $240 for a 48GB Dominator kit was “realistic” — everyone knew it wasn’t. The problem is that Corsair listed it, allowed checkout, and only then pulled the plug . That’s where trust gets damaged. Also, let’s be clear: Corsair isn’t some mom-and-pop shop living or dying on a handful of enthusiast sales. It’s a large company with enterprise and OEM partnerships. Which makes this even worse, not better — because they absolutely had the resources to handle a pricing error without nuking every order and locking down discussion afterward . As for retailers honoring mispriced items: it does happen. Not always, not everywhere, but there are plenty of documented cases across the industry where stores choose to eat the mistake rather than torch customer goodwill. Corsair chose the opposite path. The real PR failure wasn’t cancelling the orders — mistakes happen. It was the combination of cancellation, silence, post deletions, and price whiplash shortly after. When you sell premium products, you’re also selling trust . And that’s the one thing no coupon can fully refund. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ram/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ram/corsair-cancels-usd240-48gb-ddr5-memory-kit-orders-due-to-pricing-error-companys-blunder-ignites-shopper-uproar-over-botched-ram-deal#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com
- ASRock to enter AIO liquid cooling market with an intriguing pumpless design at CES — full lineup to include more traditional options, some with LCD displays
- Forgotten Star Wars Racer Revenge game is key to jailbreaking PlayStation 5, price soars 1,900% overnight amid leaked ROM keys exploit — Physical copies of the
- ASRock to enter AIO liquid cooling market with an intriguing pumpless design at CES — full lineup to include more traditional options, some with LCD displays
- Ukrainian soldier's M1 MacBook Air takes direct shrapnel hit, saving his life — screen cracked and letter 'K' missing but laptop remains functional
- How to use Plex and a spare computer to build a streaming movie service
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.