
Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He\u2019s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he\u2019s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-11/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Jowi Morales Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
USAFRet This is not new: https://dronexl.co/2025/10/09/skyany-x1-dji-mini-4-pro-clone-drone-amazon/ Reply
kameljoe23 USAFRet said: This is not new: https://dronexl.co/2025/10/09/skyany-x1-dji-mini-4-pro-clone-drone-amazon/ I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies. Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies. Reply
USAFRet kameljoe23 said: I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies. Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies. Lets not delve too far into the political. But I also fly little quadrotors. In my case, a HolyStone instead of DJI. Reply
weeeezard kameljoe23 said: I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies. Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies. kameljoe23 said: I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies. Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies. While part of me agrees with you—and I sometimes feel as if our personal info and activities are being argued over in terms of who gets to spy on us first (flock cameras, fusion centers, etc.) as citizens—I also agree that a lot of people making rules for “the people” stand to make handsome financial gains. Part of me also feels your whole thought process is glazing over details that might make this legislation legitimate. Most other countries aren’t as big of an espionage target, both industrially and in terms of national security. I mean, let’s not forget they flew balloons over the country to surveil our facilities. Remember: little pieces can be aggregated, and information can be weaponized. However, as I said earlier, it feels odd that politicians would be rabidly pushing so hard on this one issue when there are equivalent real-world shortcomings that need to be addresse kameljoe23 said: I was nearly sure I read an article a long time ago about the shell companies. Since some lobbyist s have pushed for this band so that they could potentially sell their own products DJI knew it was inevitable and opened these shell company so that they could build and sell drones within the United States. I'm sorry but the United States and those who are in power are incompetent to realize that the rest of the world uses products from China and they don't have a problem with it yet for some reason we have a problem with it. I don't use drone yet a lot of people do as well as government agencies. While part of me agrees with you—and I sometimes feel as if our personal info and activities are being argued over in terms of who gets to spy on us first (flock cameras, fusion centers, etc.) as citizens—I also agree that a lot of people making rules for “the people” stand to make handsome financial gains. Part of me also feels your whole thought process is glazing over details that might make this legislation legitimate. Most other countries aren’t as big of an espionage target, both industrially and in terms of national security. I mean, let’s not forget they flew balloons over the country to surveil our facilities. Remember: little pieces can be aggregated, and information can be weaponized. However, as I said earlier, it feels odd that politicians would be rabidly pushing so hard on this one issue when there are equivalent real-world shortcomings that need to be addressed. I do own and fly 5 DJI drones by the way. kameljoe23 said: Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/suspicious-dji-clones-appear-on-the-market-after-the-fcc-banned-foreign-made-drones-xtra-and-skyrover-drones-look-awfully-familiar#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com
- CEOs of NVIDIA and Lilly Share ‘Blueprint for What Is Possible’ in AI and Drug Discovery
- From Pilot to Profit: Survey Reveals the Financial Services Industry Is Doubling Down on AI Investment and Open Source
- $3,000 RTX 5090 delivery brings rocks, a towel, and broken dreams — unboxing nightmare on an expensive GPU bought from Amazon Resale
- CEOs of NVIDIA and Lilly Share ‘Blueprint for What Is Possible’ in AI and Drug Discovery
- Atari ST enthusiast announces the MiniST with FPGA, MiSTeryNano core, and black TKL case — priced at around $400 each, but the initial run is a mere five units
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.