
PEnns Unbelievable!! This woman needs some bad a$$ lawyer and sue the heck out of everybody involved: The Facial rec. company, the bank and the police. And the horses they rode on too!! Reply
abufrejoval She should count herself lucky: just standing close to false positives means you lose the abililty to complain in other parts of the world. Reply
DougMcC PEnns said: Unbelievable!! This woman needs some bad a$$ lawyer and sue the heck out of everybody involved: The Facial rec. company, the bank and the police. And the horses they rode on too!! This is how you solve this problem. Get her a multimillion dollar judgement and Fargo will be thinking twice about the value their facial recognition software is bringing them. Reply
QuarterSwede DougMcC said: This is how you solve this problem. Get her a multimillion dollar judgement and Fargo will be thinking twice about the value their facial recognition software is bringing them. I would certainly find a lawyer who would make a mint on suing the pants off of them as an example. I wouldn’t go for a $ amount, it would be a percentage of the company to actually hurt them. And if that’s against the law, I would challange that. The absolute lack of critical thinking and outright lazyness is disguisting, disgraceful, and embarassing. Reply
palladin9479 PEnns said: Unbelievable!! This woman needs some bad a$$ lawyer and sue the heck out of everybody involved: The Facial rec. company, the bank and the police. And the horses they rode on too!! Guaranteed she is getting calls from lawyers to represent her. There are at least two governments she can sue for seven digit figures. Reply
Ralston18 Lawsuits etc. aside, the real shame is with those who used facial recognition and immediately failed to investigate further (as detectives should do) or otherwise follow-up in some manner to determine if it all made sense. That failure is the root and the shame of it all. Overall, taking the report at face value, it narrows down to too many people simply not doing their jobs or doing their jobs properly. Mostly just common sense was needed….. There may eventually (years likely) be monetary settlements but the damage is done. People must be held fully accountable for their actions or lack of actions per situations and circumstances. It was not AI who locked the proverbial "cell and threw away the key". Reply
gamerk316 Welcome to America, where you are thrown in jail for months on end awaiting a hearing, despite literally all the evidence showing there's no way you could have committed the crime you are accused as. And you get out, and find out you lost your job, your house, and who knows what else, with little to no means of getting financial restitution. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/facial-recognition-is-jailing-the-wrong-people-police-keep-using-it-anyway#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/subscription
- How to protect yourself from bad external SSDs during the PC hardware apocalypse – newer drives will definitely cost more, and some may offer up shockingly poor
- NVIDIA Brings AI-Powered Cybersecurity to World’s Critical Infrastructure
- STMicro to deploy humanoid robots to its legacy fabs in Europe — over 100 humanoid robots to be used for routine and physically demanding tasks in fight for eff
- Flabbergasted GPU repair wizard highlights dangers of liquid metal after leak kills entire RTX 5070 Ti — user-applied TIM spread to every crevice of the PCB, ph
- ‘Clean-room reimplementation’ of DR-DOS hits early beta, modernizing the operating system 38 years after its debut — runs Doom, Warcraft, SimCity, and other per
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.