AMD’s Frank Azor pushes back against claim that FSR 4.1 won’t be ported to RDNA 3.5 GPUs — says ‘no such decision’ has been made

AMD's Frank Azor pushes back against claim that FSR 4.1 won't be ported to RDNA 3.5 GPUs — says 'no such decision' has been made

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom\u2019s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-24/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Aaron Klotz Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

Notton Videocardz vs. Frank Azor? These info sources are awful. You might as well ask a magic 8 ball. Reply

usertests Notton said: Videocardz vs. Frank Azor? These info sources are awful. You might as well ask a magic 8 ball. The source was Hardware Luxx, a German outlet, and they were told it directly from AMD's David McAfee. AMD is the awful source in the end. Reply

DS426 AMD needs to simplify their support policies: hardware that is in support and software that is in support are supported together, with VERY few exceptions. If something has a huge perf penalty like FSR4 on RDNA2, that caution should be said upfront and then left upon the user. Instead, AMD is trying too hard by determining what has value to who and when, and that's obviously just getting too messy; two different key spokespeople over a product aren't on the same page, so… Reply

psyconz DS426 said: AMD needs to simplify their support policies: hardware that is in support and software that is in support are supported together, with VERY few exceptions. If something has a huge perf penalty like FSR4 on RDNA2, that caution should be said upfront and then left upon the user. Instead, AMD is trying too hard by determining what has value to who and when, and that's obviously just getting too messy; two different key spokespeople over a product aren't on the same page, so… I get the impression with a lot of these large organisations, that the left hand often doesn't know what the right hand is doing. It's definitely a matter of, between organisations, they might sue each other over one thing, meanwhile, at exactly the same time, be collaborating on things in other areas. It sure is an interesting world we live in. 🤣 Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment