Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He\u2019s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he\u2019s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-25/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Jowi Morales Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
GenericUser2001 They should have done what Google did when it created Google Books – check a ton of books out from libraries, and then mass scan them. Reply
hotaru251 while the court ruled that training AI on books is considered fair use under copyright law so basically if you wanna pirate just make a defense that you were making your own model and you are all good….man the system is so broken its beyond funny…. Reply
GenericUser2001 hotaru251 said: so basically if you wanna pirate just make a defense that you were making your own model and you are all good….man the system is so broken its beyond funny…. Huh? Anthropic is having to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement because of their "piracy" (well copyright infringement). I would not call that "all good". Its just that using the data for AI training by itself is considered fair use as it is "transformative" enough to fall under that doctrine. Reply
bigdragon while the court ruled that training AI on books is considered fair use under copyright law So it's fair use for a 380 billion dollar AI company to ingest and later reproduce — for a profit — text from a book verbatim. Meanwhile, some poor puts a quote from a public official in a video, shares a screenshot or clip from a game, or has a few seconds of background music in a short and the corporations are screaming copyright infringement while trying to bury the person responsible. This ruling makes no sense. A normal person would not be treated the same way Anthropic is being treated here. I'm really tired of all these "guilty enough for a payout, but not guilty enough to be assigned fault" rulings. Reply
-Fran- It's ok guys. The investors will pay/cover this with a smile on their collective faces! Heh. Regards. Reply
paxhumana123 hotaru251 said: so basically if you wanna pirate just make a defense that you were making your own model and you are all good….man the system is so broken its beyond funny…. GenericUser2001 said: They should have done what Google did when it created Google Books – check a ton of books out from libraries, and then mass scan them. The solution is simple, find the copyright squatting scum and make them all go on one way camping/fishing trips…no one to claim copyrights on you also means no one to file copyright claims on you, right? Reply
COLGeek paxhumana123 said: The solution is simple, find the copyright squatting scum and make them all go on one way camping/fishing trips…no one to claim copyrights on you also means no one to file copyright claims on you, right? Just for clarity, please define "copyright squatting scum". I'm not following this threatening logic. Reply
Dav_Daddy Admin said: Meta, which reportedly torrented 82TB of pirated books for AI training. The latter argued that its framework also have “non-infringing uses,” but the court said that it’s not the entire system, but specific tools within it that were the issue. As for Meta, it claimed that its use of pirated material was legal as long as it did not seed content. That's only going to work for them if they own a legal copy in some format of each work in question. Actually now that I think about it for a minute. Is there some subscription service that allows you to legally access a very large volume of books for a monthly fee ala Netflix? If so and they weren't using a title in more simultaneous instances than they had a right to there is a chance this could fly! Reply
rw3iss Poor Anthropic. It really is lame. Meta better get slammed worse or this needs a retrial. They're not stealing books and redistributing them. People are still going to buy books if they want to read them. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/anthropic-slapped-with-usd1-5-billion-settlement-in-copyright-lawsuit-largest-payout-ever-court-says-that-training-ai-on-books-other-publications-is-fair-use-but-ruled-that-the-startups-7-million-book-pirated-library-infringes-authors-rights#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/subscription
- Clever hacker fits 537,000 domains in a tiny $5 ESP32 ad-blocking dongle — firmware uses only around 50KB of RAM and can answer blocked lookups in 10 millisecon
- Kimi K3 rocks the AI industry as Moonshot AI undercuts closed-source American competitors on price — but the huge 2.8T open-weight model still needs serious har
- AMD's next-gen 10-core 'Medusa Point' APU shows up on Geekbench again, with its best score yet — leaked SKU outpaces every other x86 mobile chip in the single-c
- China is considering export controls on AI technologies, including banning local companies from using TSMC, report claims — restrictions would also cover advanc
- SMIC's third-gen 7nm node shows smaller metal pitch than Intel 18A, higher transistor density than TSMC N6 without EUV — analysis of N+3 shows significant advan
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.