Benchmarks of Performance-core only Bartlett Lake CPU emerge, 10-core offers 26% faster multithreaded performance than 14-core i5-14400 — 12-core version launch

Benchmarks of Performance-core only Bartlett Lake CPU emerge, 10-core offers 26% faster multithreaded performance than 14-core i5-14400 — 12-core version launch

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom\u2019s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-11/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Aaron Klotz Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

TerryLaze Admin said: There are no 13th or 14th gen CPUs that feature 12 or 10 P-cores, making these chips very interesting options for niche applications that only need 10 or 12 cores. If you want to call gaming niche… Not having e-cores allows all the power, both literally and figuratively, to go to the p-cores, so higher clocks and less having game threads be mistakenly send to the e-cores. Reply

hotaru251 comparing it to the 10core 14400 seems "meh" given the fact its finally not a +++++ node & the big thing…the new one is running up to 800MHZ faster…. thats a massive 17% increase in clock speed even ignoring any actual improvement to anythign else. Reply

TerryLaze hotaru251 said: comparing it to the 10core 14400 seems "meh" given the fact its finally not a +++++ node & the big thing…the new one is running up to 800MHZ faster…. thats a massive 17% increase in clock speed even ignoring any actual improvement to anythign else. But the single score is lower on the new one, which isn't anything new, pre release scores often are running at lower than max clocks. Reply

thestryker Comparing 65W base TDP to 125W base TDP similar core count parts is largely going to end up only one way. These BTL parts aren't likely to be unlocked and in the case of the Core 9 have worse boost clocks than 14900K/KS. The all core boost does seem to be about the same, but it's hard to say if that can be sustained within power limits. There is a possibility that the ring bus might be able to clock higher, but it will have the same number of stops as RPL so this would be the only way for the latency to improve. I don't believe they have AVX512 either, but I can't be bothered to check just relying on memory so this may be wrong. Overall these seem well suited for what they're aimed at, but don't seem like they'd add anything to the client market. Of course it could just be Intel 7 running at capacity to blame for why client focused unlocked versions with high single/dual core boosts haven't materialized. Reply

Moores_Ghost 10p cores is faster than 6 p cores and 4 e cores? Lol! You don't say? So 10 cores at full power with full instructions and higher clocks are faster than 6p and 4 E where the 4 E is a full 1 Ghz or more slower, doesn't have the full instructions and has IPC from the Skylake era. You don't say, eh sonny? You do know even if you use AI you still need an editor and fact checker that ARE NOT AI, right? Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment