Intel commits to 14A mass production in 2028 as its sales rise 25% year-over-year

Intel commits to 14A mass production in 2028 as its sales rise 25% year-over-year

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom\u2019s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-25/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Anton Shilov Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

thestryker Intel typically begins manufacturing using its leading-edge nodes in its development fab in Oregon and while it formally calls it HVM, actual volumes produced at such fabs are relatively low. With Intel 14A this could be flipped on its head a bit due to High-NA. The only publicly available knowledge is that Intel has 3 machines and they're all in Oregon. Presumably Fab 52 and Fab 62 in Arizona are prepared for High-NA installation, but a 2028 HVM gives them less than 2 years to acquire, install and validate. Given that the Ohio fab is supposed to be 14A it's possible that Oregon will be producing all 14A until that comes online. Reply

ezst036 Its crazy that Intel of all companies has become so reliant upon corporate welfare anymore. They can't seem to survive without other people's money. Reply

Gururu ezst036 said: Its crazy that Intel of all companies has become so reliant upon corporate welfare anymore. They can't seem to survive without other people's money. This reminds me of the recent story of how Sega kept nVidia alive back in the day. Reply

ezst036 Gururu said: This reminds me of the recent story of how Sega kept nVidia alive back in the day. That's true but with an asterisk. Sega agreed with Nvidia and Nvidia agreed with Sega – that is………………. all parties were in consent. Millions of us never consented to the free money Intel received. Consent was violated. Reply

thestryker ezst036 said: Millions of us never consented to the free money Intel received. Consent was violated. Government representatives were elected and chose this course of action thus consent was given by living within the confines of the country. Reply

Gururu thestryker said: Government representatives were elected and chose this course of action thus consent was given by living within the confines of the country. Yes, even though the administration I didn't vote for has used just about every one of my tax pennies for activities I furiously oppose, I do choose to live in this country because it was already great. Reply

TerryLaze ezst036 said: That's true but with an asterisk. Sega agreed with Nvidia and Nvidia agreed with Sega – that is………………. all parties were in consent. Millions of us never consented to the free money Intel received. Consent was violated. "Free" money, it only cost them 10% OF THEIR COMPANY in stock… Intel stock is at $90 today while it was "bought" (stolen) at $20 . You are the one (u.s. citizens) that got the free money, intel is the one that got bend over, they were forced to give away stock for work rendered…they build the fabs that are investments in the country and had to part with their stock as a thank you from the gov. Reply

ezst036 thestryker said: Government representatives were elected and chose this course of action thus consent was given by living within the confines of the country. Gururu said: Yes, even though the administration I didn't vote for has used just about every one of my tax pennies for activities I furiously oppose, 🤔 These two comments look good put right next to each other here. That furiously oppose part doesn't exactly look to me like consent. Reply

thestryker ezst036 said: 🤔 These two comments look good put right next to each other here. That furiously oppose part doesn't exactly look to me like consent. Except that it is because whether or not you vote for someone, or agree with them, has literally nothing to do with it. I'm not sure why the concept of government is so lost on you. I didn't vote for those who are currently in charge and can't stand the vast majority of what they're doing. I still choose to live here rather than leave and in doing so one has to accept that there's going to be stuff that happens which you don't like and have no recourse against. Reply

usertests ezst036 said: 🤔 These two comments look good put right next to each other here. That furiously oppose part doesn't exactly look to me like consent. I didn't consent to live in a federal republic! I didn't consent to be born! etc. Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment