usertests Gururu said: It's at processor level right, so good for all GPUs? Yeah, shouldn't have anything to do with the GPU, it's all CPU-related. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000102604/processors.html Processors supported by Intel® Binary Optimization Tool: Intel® Core™ Ultra 200 Plus Series processors (product formerly known as Arrow Lake Refresh). Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Processor 250K Plus Intel® Core™ Ultra 5 Processor 250KF Plus Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 270K Plus Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 processor 290HX Plus Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 processor 270HX PlusIntel® Core™ Ultra Processors (Series 3) (product formerly known as Panther Lake). Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 356H Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386HNote Intel® Arc™ G3 Processor Series are not supported for Intel® Application Optimization or Intel® Binary Optimization. This is very weird information. Why not the the X9/X7 with big iGPUs, or any other Panther Lake chips? Why not the Core Ultra 7 366H, which is just a higher clocked 356H? And why not the Arc G3 handheld APUs? Reply
JakeRoach usertests said: Yeah, shouldn't have anything to do with the GPU, it's all CPU-related. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000102604/processors.html This is very weird information. Why not the the X9/X7 with big iGPUs, or any other Panther Lake chips? Why not the Core Ultra 7 366H, which is just a higher clocked 356H? And why not the Arc G3 handheld APUs? I will reach out to Intel and ask because that's a good question. Reply
thestryker usertests said: This is very weird information. Why not the the X9/X7 with big iGPUs, or any other Panther Lake chips? Why not the Core Ultra 7 366H, which is just a higher clocked 356H? And why not the Arc G3 handheld APUs? They already answered this question during the rollout: there was no point with anything that is always GPU limited. They purposely omitted all of the PTL CPUs with the big Graphics Tile and were only picking ones which would be used with dGPUs. The 366H seems like an omission unless it's a product that's effectively not really being sold. While I wish they'd just do it anyways I understand their choice as that is more validation they need to do. SOTTR is an interesting case because of the metrics they pull during the benchmark which end up showing exactly what IBOT does despite the fps not changing much: https://i.imgur.com/EpHi6qz.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/7hDJNCw.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/rLlsdwM.jpeg Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intel-expands-new-game-boosting-ibot-software-with-seven-more-games-up-to-a-27-percent-improvement-team-blue-claims-12-percent-average-jump-in-newly-supported-titles#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/subscription
- Industrial Software Leaders Build Secure, Autonomous AI Engineers With NVIDIA NemoClaw
- Intel's upcoming Z970 and Z990 flagship chipsets will reportedly consume up to 14W at peak load, courtesy of more PCIe 5.0 support — Nova Lake motherboards may
- 3D-printed nozzles could revolutionize drug and self-healing material manufacturing — MIT-developed triaxial electrospray design makes cleanroom fabrication opt
- Four suspects identified in Finland undersea cable damage investigation — criminal case referred to prosecutors for consideration of charges
- Google reportedly books Intel for packaging more than 3 million TPUs in 2028 — SK hynix is testing Intel's EMIB packaging for HBM integration
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.