Intel’s P-core Core 9 273PQE ‘Bartlett Lake’ CPU beats 14900K by up to 9% in gaming tests — embedded-only chip is unofficially Intel’s fastest gaming CPU (at 72

Intel's P-core Core 9 273PQE 'Bartlett Lake' CPU beats 14900K by up to 9% in gaming tests — embedded-only chip is unofficially Intel's fastest gaming CPU (at 72

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom\u2019s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-23/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Aaron Klotz Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

thestryker I skimmed through the video and the clock speeds don't make any sense. The 273PQE is running higher/more stable clocks than the 14900K so of course it's going to have higher performance. It's entirely possible they were either running power limited or there's something off with the motherboard as the 14900K has higher power limits and boost clocks. This testing unfortunately doesn't prove anything at all. It would be nice if when things like this got posted the authors could go to a tiny bit of effort to see what might be going on. Reply

DingusDog Up to 9% faster than the 14900K which is almost 3 years old… That is some amazing innovation. Reply

bit_user DingusDog said: Up to 9% faster than the 14900K which is almost 3 years old… That is some amazing innovation. Nobody ever claimed it was an innovation. Intel only claimed that it was better-suited to a particular set of realtime/embedded systems than their hybrid CPUs, which is why they didn't make it as a retail product. Reply

cp0x DingusDog said: Up to 9% faster than the 14900K which is almost 3 years old… That is some amazing innovation. Yup. I notice they didn't compare it to the 9850x3d …. Reply

bit_user cp0x said: Yup. I notice they didn't compare it to the 9850x3d …. That would be interesting, but so would 9900X (i.e. because both are 12 P-cores / 24 threads). Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment