Neither Musk, Altman, nor Brockman was present in court to hear the verdict. The three-week trial featured testimony from six tech billionaires, including OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, and hundreds of pages of private emails, text messages, and internal meeting notes entered into evidence.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.\u00a0 Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.\u00a0 ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-23/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Luke James Social Links Navigation Contributor Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
hotaru251 git bent muskrat. I dislike openai greatly but the muskrat deserves every L he can get. also wasn't he only whining after they removed him as he had also planned to make it for profit early on? anyone who paid attention to "ai"'s cost knew that it was always going to be for profit as it is impossible to do otherwise and still be relevant Reply
alan.campbell99 Some form of M.A.D. would have been nice to see but there was never any chance of that imho. Reply
blppt Must be nice to waste taxpayer money with frivolous lawsuits. Ahhh, to be insanely rich. Reply
blppt hotaru251 said: git bent muskrat. I dislike openai greatly but the muskrat deserves every L he can get. also wasn't he only whining after they removed him as he had also planned to make it for profit early on? anyone who paid attention to "ai"'s cost knew that it was always going to be for profit as it is impossible to do otherwise and still be relevant Politics aside, I find it absolutely fascinating that so many people line up to throw money at Musk when he was AGAIN appearing high in public at the China summit. High finance continues to make no sense to me. Reply
bit_user alan.campbell99 said: Some form of M.A.D. would have been nice to see but there was never any chance of that imho. I know. I really wanted them both to somehow lose! I think maybe there's an upside though, in terms of what's come to light in the discovery process and testimony? Usually, cases like this get settled out of court, and that info never sees the light of day. Now, it's public record! Reply
bit_user blppt said: Must be nice to waste taxpayer money with frivolous lawsuits. Ahhh, to be insanely rich. Since this is a civil case, Musk should be paying the court costs. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/jury-throws-out-elon-musks-lawsuit-against-openai-after-less-than-two-hours-of-deliberation#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/subscription
- Texas county passes data center ban for rural areas for a year, move comes in wake of AI data centers moving to remote areas to skirt regulations — state senato
- Linus Torvalds says flood of duplicate AI-generated vulnerability reports have made Linux security mailing list 'almost entirely unmanageable' — private list 'a
- Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus vs AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D faceoff — Battle for the fastest mid-range gaming CPU
- MSI Raider 16 Max HX review: Elite gaming performance
- Get an entire RTX 5090 gaming PC for around the price of just the GPU — a high-end battle station for under $4,000
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.