Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He\u2019s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he\u2019s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-25/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Jowi Morales Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
DS426 “As far as I know, I’m in the clear unless the county is feeling froggy.” – Lux Claridge I like this guy. Reply
KaiserTom Maybe if you receive death threats for selling out your municipality and tax payers to billionaires, you should take it as a sign to stop and maybe get out of office for being corrupt cronies. When you remove all non-violent ways to protest and disagree with the actions of your government, you only leave one action left. And you should expect it as you deserve. No sympathy, no empathy, and no remorse for sell-out politicians to the wannabe plutocrat billionaires. Reply
hotaru251 The city said that commissioners were receiving death threats from external sources However, it also didn’t allow public comments, which some are questioning, although it did tell citizens that they can phone in their concerns instead when your city is willing ot make threats to prevent stuff happening..and then they effectively say "no public concerns allowed' (as i doubt the phone in concerns ever made it to the ears of anyone but the front desk) …you know you should probably not do it. Reply
thisisaname No and I dislike the idea that "people" need to conform or face arrest. He waited until the speaker had finished speaking and clapped, for a couple of seconds at most. Even if you say is clappng did disrupt the meeting, his arrest was far more disruptive and out of proportion to the offence. Do you want to live in a world where you have to obey everything those in charge say or risk being arrested? Reply
hotaru251 thisisaname said: , his arrest was far more disruptive and out of proportion to the offence. if you read it he was not gonna be arrested for the clapping. (just remvoed from room) What got him arrested was his refusal to leave and him saying to drag him out. While overboard it was not clapping that got him jailed but the refusing to leave that did. Reply
Bigshrimp hotaru251 said: if you read it he was not gonna be arrested for the clapping. (just remvoed from room) What got him arrested was his refusal to leave and him saying to drag him out. While overboard it was not clapping that got him jailed but the refusing to leave that did. That's literally a logical fallacy if you consider the constitution and the rights enshrined within. He shouldn't have been threatened to be removed for simply clapping in the first place. Then arresting him after threatening to remove him is all on them for trampling on his first amendment right to be there. I hope he sues the council, the mayor, and the police for breach of his first amendment rights for being removed and arrested for simply clapping after someone spoke. He would very easily win in court if the judge isn't corrupt, which I would hope so for all our sakes. What is shocking based on what happened is the judge that dismissed his case made sure to label it as "without prejudice", meaning that they may try to charge him again, which is insane. He is just one guy against the might of the machine and they just don't like him clapping. I hope you or anyone you know doesn't get arrested for exercising their first amendment rights, which should not happen in a lawful society. I really wonder if anyone even knows their rights anymore, lol. Reply
hotaru251 Bigshrimp said: He shouldn't have been threatened to be removed for simply clapping in the first place. I dislike the outcome myself, but in this case the rules were stated prior to it happening. If you break a rule it is 100% acceptable to be asked to leave for not respecting the prior rules. Bigshrimp said: I hope he sues the council, the mayor, and the police for breach of his first amendment rights for being removed and arrested for simply clapping after someone spoke except thats not how it works. HE broke rule, refused to leave & told them to drag him out…and he was released after 8hrs….all of which is legal (police can legally toss you in prison for any reason w/o proof for up to liek 24-72hrs and its still "legal" (which is crappy). Bigshrimp said: doesn't get arrested for exercising their first amendment rights you seem to be twisting that view with the fact he ignored rules…. even 1st amendment has limitations (such as it in fact only applies to Gov taking your rites and why private/public/work places can do so legally) sucks what happened but it was no illegal to do so. (just scummy) Reply
Bigshrimp hotaru251 said: I dislike the outcome myself, but in this case the rules were stated prior to it happening. If you break a rule it is 100% acceptable to be asked to leave for not respecting the prior rules. except thats not how it works. HE broke rule, refused to leave & told them to drag him out…and he was released after 8hrs….all of which is legal (police can legally toss you in prison for any reason w/o proof for up to liek 24-72hrs and its still "legal" (which is crappy). you seem to be twisting that view with the fact he ignored rules…. even 1st amendment has limitations (such as it in fact only applies to Gov taking your rites and why private/public/work places can do so legally) sucks what happened but it was no illegal to do so. (just scummy) The way you describe this nonsense is like we are in kindergarten and the kids are being bad, so they need to be punished, lol. These people are adults with lives, a community, and the right to make their voices heard. If clapping constitutes some draconian rule breaking and goes against the Constitution, the Constitution takes precedence and should be enforced properly so people can practice their rights enshrined in the Constitution. The rule they are enforcing should be unenforceable if the actual Constitution was being followed. Citizens have a first amendment right to speak to their government without hinderance or loss of liberty. You might want to do some more research. Not much else I can explain to you if you can't grasp what I have already said. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers/kansas-town-drops-charges-against-teacher-who-clapped-during-public-hearings-on-data-centers-says-that-case-has-been-dismissed-without-prejudice#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/membership
- Glass substrate roadmaps examined — Absolics in final qualification and a first product that keeps slipping
- Securing the Infrastructure of Intelligence
- Alienware AW3926QW 39-inch WUHD OLED gaming monitor review: Premium play and imagery in a large format
- Save $260 on this high-end AM5 gaming combo from Newegg — just $1,345.99 buys a Ryzen 9 9950X3D, 32GB Corsair DDR5 RAM, MSI X870E Carbon Wifi motherboard, along
- Crucial SSD owner offered $200 refund for 4TB drive now selling for over $500 — company finally caves to warranty demands after protracted back-and-forth
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.