When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works .
The leap second is occasionally added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) to ensure that it remains in-sync with the Earth’s rotation. Our planet’s movement isn’t a constant one revolution every 24 hours owing to forces applied by the atmosphere, the oceans, its core, and even the Moon, and according to BIPM [ PDF ], these changes mean a 30% probability of needing a “negative leap second” by 2035.
A positive leap second adds an extra second in the year that it’s applied — for example, clocks went to 23:59:60 on Dec. 31, 2016, before switching to 00:00:00 on Jan. 1, 2017. This could spell trouble for machines that haven’t been updated to accommodate this, especially as leap seconds aren’t applied at a constant scale, meaning programmers cannot pre-program events like these, unlike leap years, which usually happen every four years. What’s more concerning is that the opposite of a positive leap second has never been done before. “A negative leap second has not previously been applied, and it is considered to pose a high risk of causing anomalies and disruption to critical infrastructures that are largely unprepared,” the BIPM said. It also estimated that the required investment to prepare for this event to be “similar to their preparations for the millennium bug.”
Leap seconds have also historically caused problems for websites and tech companies, with Reddit famously crashing after the 2012 addition of a leap second. While a leap second will likely not affect a desktop PC, especially if the Time Service server it relies on is updated, the BIPM is still worried that national critical infrastructures like transportation, energy distribution, telecommunications, and even space projects could descend into chaos if it enforces a negative leap second. So, instead of spending money upgrading software and replacing incompatible hardware within the next 10 years, the international standards body instead opted to scrap it altogether and replace it with the leap hour next year.
The group says that this would ensure long-term continuity for UTC, which is expected to remain in sync with TAI for several centuries. This also means that you no longer have to manually adjust your clocks every few years or so to exactly match this Raspberry Pi Pico atomic clock . While a time jump of an hour might be shocking for many people if and when it happens in the distant future, the BIPM recognizes that something similar already exists globally. “In many countries, there are differences of more than one hour between local apparent solar time and civil time due to the choice of time zone,” the organization wrote. It also added that “changes of an hour are regularly introduced when daylight-saving time is used.”
Google confirms ChromeOS phase out in 2034 — 10-year support lifetime cut short for some devices, company says it will support transition to Googlebook OS
Hardware researcher spins up 'CPU deoptimization' project to find the slowest single x86 instruction, creates hall of shame
Linux enthusiasts see 10-second kernel compilation times on the horizon
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/international-measurement-organization-to-retire-leap-seconds-next-year-to-avoid-wreaking-havoc-on-computer-systems-group-makes-move-to-simplify-atomic-time-tracking#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/membership
- Two killed, one seriously hurt in explosion at Intel’s chip plant in Israel
- How NVIDIA GPUs Help Accelerate OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra Ultrafast
- ASML struggling to keep up with demand for chipmaking equipment as AI spending continues to boom
- Jailbroken PS5s can now run local AI models at over 100+ tokens per second
- NVIDIA Announces New Investments in France’s Startups
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.