Jhet Borja Social Links Navigation Freelance Writer Jhet Borja is a serial hobbyist who was taking apart toys from childhood and sketching inventions. He now loves doing DIY projects ranging from designing custom 3D-printed parts, building PCs and keyboards, all the way to woodworking. If he's not getting his hands dirty, he's probably brainstorming his next project.
blppt I don't get it, one guy manages to put this together as a pet project, and AMD can't come up with this stuff on their own? Reply
Vicecrow One Guy dont need to worry about 999 Lawyers AMD has. AMD and Nvidia only will copy the free cheap labor and and adjust these new fake frames Reply
-Fran- blppt said: I don't get it, one guy manages to put this together as a pet project, and AMD can't come up with this stuff on their own? Patents, trademark and licensing. Regards. Reply
blppt -Fran- said: Patents, trademark and licensing. Regards. Then I'd imagine Nvidia would be shutting him down in short order. Reply
derekullo blppt said: Then I'd imagine Nvidia would be shutting him down in short order. I don't think Nvidia cares. As long as someone is using their software then their software programmers have done their job. Despite how fancy CUDA and DLSS 5 is, don't forget, Nvidia is at its core a hardware selling company. DLL injection, as the last line hints at, makes this almost instantly bannable in multiplayer games which sees any DLL altering as an attempt to cheat. If someone wants to use DLSS 5 in a popular multiplayer game like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 then they are forced to use Nvidia. If they use this mod to make it work in other single player games and it turns out to work really well then that entices them even more to buy one of the Nvidia graphics cards for use in multiplayer games. On top of that the author even says compatibility isn't 100% with Reddit users also weighing in with some downsides. Reply
bill001g blppt said: Then I'd imagine Nvidia would be shutting him down in short order. It gets really hard when the person doing it is not doing it for money. They will spend lots of money on lawyers and recover none of it. They run the risk that suing the little guy will be bad publicity and he might get massive funding with gofundme. If it gets too big they get a lot of people looking at the patent they are trying to enforce and someone might find a defect in their patent and they lose big. They are better off just collecting data for the future and if it really becomes a issue they can call the lawyers. Right now nvidia only care about how much money they can make on AI. Reply
rluker5 blppt said: Then I'd imagine Nvidia would be shutting him down in short order. His use of AI is his shield. 1. AI helped him with the coding and made it possible, making this program an advertisement for AI. Which does Nvidia care more about? AI or gaming? 2. AI did it the same way AI usually does, by taking others material as data and modifying it. If Nvidia sues some guy for using AI as it is intended, then what good is AI if it can't use other people's data without permission? There could be a legal precedent set that protects IP holders over AI users. Nvidia would lose far more than it could keep and the main creator of this particular IP theft industry having its IP kind of stolen by its creation is uncommonly fitting. It would make a good fable in a childrens book. I hope they get it working for Arc. According to Techpowerup my A750 has more FP16 and INT8 than a 5070, 3090 or 9070GRE, and far more than a 7900XTX. Reply
PEnns The wishes of billions of gamers crying and praying to the highest heavens for a chance to kill the performance of their GPUs have been finally answered!! But hey, now they can see a puddle's reflection at 20 -25 FPS!! Reply
Vicecrow derekullo said: I don't think Nvidia cares. Software is what makes Nvidia better than the rivals and they care a lot. AMD has more power on these chip out here but every one wait years to software mature. It's why they keep selling the rx580 like hot cakes. It's old but still working like day one. Reply
derekullo Vicecrow said: Software is what makes Nvidia better than the rivals and they care a lot. AMD has more power on these chip out here but every one wait years to software mature. It's why they keep selling the rx580 like hot cakes. It's old but still working like day one. Software is important for Nvidia, but it isn't what they are selling. They can give the software away for free as long as it runs best on Nvidia hardware. If Nvidia really wanted a monopoly on DLSS 5 then they could have done any number of methods to impede the progress for non-nvidia graphics cards. But they didn't do a thing short of having their hardware better positioned for AI use. HuggingFace fits into this somewhere lol Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/amd-cards-now-run-all-dlss-features-thanks-to-one-developers-project-plans-to-match-native-nvidia-gpu-performance#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/membership
- Engineer builds tiny 3D-printed single-motor drone in their bedroom
- MOZA AY210 Force Feedback Base and MFY Yoke review: Taking flight sim immersion to the next level
- DJI’s first battery-swapping dock gets drones recharged and back in the air in under 45 seconds
- TP-Link proposes $1 billion US Wi-Fi router manufacturing alliance with Key Tronic
- RTX Spark Ignites Global Celebration as New Windows PCs Arrive
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.