Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he\u2019s not working, you\u2019ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-24/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Hassam Nasir Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
dion_ There's an information asymmetry here that arguably shouldn't be legal. The licensing agreements between Sony and these studios have terms — a start date, an end date, renewal options — but none of that is disclosed to customers at the point of sale. You could buy a movie without realizing the license expires in two days, then lose it before you've even watched it, with no refund. Disclosing the license expiration date on the store page should be mandatory — especially when storefronts use the words 'buy' and 'purchase' for what is actually a revocable license. Reply
chaos215bar2 If buying isn't owning, then piracy isn't stealing. All this action by Sony does is prove for the umpteenth time that piracy is 100% morally justifiable. Until the law protects consumers from predatory corporations who would allow their customers to "purchase" a product only to change the terms or unilaterally delete it at a later point, there is zero reason anyone should feel obligated to pay for the content being produced and distributed by a company like Sony. So go ahead, pirate content owned or produced by Sony Pictures or Sony BMG and subsidiaries to your heart's content. Just be smart about it so you don't get caught. It's the only morally right thing to do. Reply
bit_user chaos215bar2 said: If buying isn't owning, then piracy isn't stealing. No. Only if you use a very specific definition of "stealing", then it's not. However, we've had IP laws for hundreds of years (originally to deal with unauthorized copies being made of printed works). "Intellectual Property" is a concept that was introduced as a recognition that the knowledge economy needs such a framework to enable it. Even open source software depends on copyrights. chaos215bar2 said: All this action by Sony does is prove for the umpteenth time that piracy is 100% morally justifiable. If nobody paid for IP, then it would not get produced. You should pay for the content you value. If not for legal reasons, then for moral ones. People accepted the idea of buying a movie ticket to go see a movie in a theater, even though by doing so you don't "own" the movie and would have to buy another ticket for each time you wanted to watch it that way. At one time, this was the only way to watch movies, and the public was fine with that. chaos215bar2 said: So go ahead, pirate content owned or produced by Sony Pictures or Sony BMG and subsidiaries to your heart's content. This seems to me a self-serving narrative, where people will basically find any excuse possible to justify not paying for something. Criminals always have a rationale for their crimes. I don't say that to convince you that piracy is a crime, but more to make the point that just because you can rationalize something in your own mind doesn't mean it's not a crime. The morally-correct response to this incident is not to buy movies (or perhaps other content) on Sony's platforms. Go back to buying physical discs, if you really want to protect your ability to continue watching it. Reply
naryfa If you bought something and it is taken away, that's theft. How much clearer does it need to be? It's basic to the core. I pay, it's mine. The button you told me to click didn't say RENT, it said BUY. Every form of gibberish after that is 2> /dev/null Reply
bit_user naryfa said: If you bought something and it is taken away, that's theft. Well… if you read the fine print, then it probably says in there that the access is revocable. I'm sure this sort of thing has happened with online game purchases. I know for a fact that it's happened with e-books. If I bought something and lost access to it, before I could watch it, I'd be pretty annoyed. However, do you really expect to own it like forever? I think nothing in the cloud is truly forever. Even if we're talking about physical media, pressed discs degrade. So, at a certain point, they might become unplayable. VHS tapes and Laserdiscs also degrade. It just seems to me that nothing is really and truly forever . naryfa said: How much clearer does it need to be? It's basic to the core. I pay, it's mine. The button you told me to click didn't say RENT, it said BUY. Every form of gibberish after that is 2> /dev/null So, that's how I see it. If the terms & conditions of online purchases don't meet your expectations or requirements, then don't buy. These days, you can use AI tools to help you understand EULAs. Years ago, there was an app (I think it was called EULAlyzer?) that would analyze EULAs and highlight suspicious terms & conditions. With the power of modern AI, such tools should be a lot better. That said, I could support legislation to make these kinds of terms & conditions clearer for people to understand and maybe place some legal minimums on what is termed an online "purchase". BTW, I own plenty of discs & other media. If you want to boycott streaming or online purchases, that's totally fine and a personal decision nobody can really argue with. The only thing I'm against is trying to use this as a justification of piracy. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/playstation/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/playstation/playstation-is-removing-over-500-movies-from-uk-customers-accounts-with-no-refunds-iconic-films-like-terminator-2-apocalypse-now-and-mulholland-drive-are-getting-deleted#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/subscription
- 400 domains used for illegal 2026 World Cup streams seized by US Justice Department — operation is five times the scale of the previous crackdown
- Digitize your library with these Blu-Ray or DVD drives from as little as $27 in these Prime Day deals — revive your old DVD/Blu-Ray collection with these drive
- Framework's Laptop 13 Pro DIY Edition now costs less than before, but a CPU price hike might be coming — Cheaper PCIe 5.0 drives from Adata upgrade customers fr
- Lenovo says the 'RAMageddon' is the new normal, outlines survival guide — at ISC 2026 an exec said 'it will never be like it was last year'
- OpenAI's ChatGPT-5.6 gets the same banhammer treatment as Anthropic’s Mythos from the federal government — source says that Washington cautioned OpenAI against
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.