Researchers train AI to detect concealed handguns using Wi-Fi signals

Researchers train AI to detect concealed handguns using Wi-Fi signals

Etiido Uko Social Links Navigation News Contributor Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.

TechieTwo Great… but can it tell if the person has a legit concealed carry permit? 😉 Reply

VizzieTheViz TechieTwo said: Great… but can it tell if the person has a legit concealed carry permit? 😉 In most countries people aren’t allowed to carry handguns (let alone all the other guns that are legal to own and carry in the US), concealed or otherwise. It seems this tech could be somewhat useful if deployed in settings where the building layout is well known and guns pose even more risk than they normally do by, well, just being a gun. The accuracy and problems when the building layout is unknown looks like it’s not very usable in other scenarios yet. Reply

rluker5 Sounds like a job for a novel holster coating. To tell that wifi detector you are good to go. Reply

bill001g This almost seems like a AI hallucination to begin with. How could they know its a gun but not know where on a person it was located. It would have to somehow be detecting shape and then it would know the location. If it is just somehow detecting metal how does it tell that is not steel in a workman boots. They also do not say if there were testing for concealed or open carried weapons. Wifi has massive trouble going through materials and it must pass though the materials twice. They also did not detail the distance they were testing at and wifi loses power exponentially with distance. They also did not state if they were using legal transmit power or some military weapon stuff. More likely this is some data that will be proven wrong by a different group in the future. The guys that wrote it seem similar to university groups that must publish stuff to keep there funding. Little is done when the published studies are found to be incorrect in the future. At best they write a small disclaimer but they are too busy publishing their next set of nonsense so they keep getting their paycheck from some source that tends to funded by taxpayers. Reply

USAFRet Thanks to all that participated, but this is going farther and farther afield. Closing it. Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment