Self-driving Ford F-250 truck with shotgun-equipped drone-killing turret tested by US Army — autonomous system designed to blast fast-moving drones at between 1

Self-driving Ford F-250 truck with shotgun-equipped drone-killing turret tested by US Army — autonomous system designed to blast fast-moving drones at between 1

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-25/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Mark Tyson Social Links Navigation News Editor Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

hotaru251 so who wants to tell em? blasting drones willynilly isnt always gonna be a good thing when they start making drones carry toxic stuff that is then scattered on the public populace when exploded? Reply

Bigshrimp hotaru251 said: so who wants to tell em? blasting drones willynilly isnt always gonna be a good thing when they start making drones carry toxic stuff that is then scattered on the public populace when exploded? We could tell them, but would they listen? I doubt they even care about that specific concern due to what their actions tell us. Reply

USAFRet hotaru251 said: so who wants to tell em? blasting drones willynilly isnt always gonna be a good thing when they start making drones carry toxic stuff that is then scattered on the public populace when exploded? Chemical weapons. That has been a possibility for 100+ years. People and armies generally don't do that for 'reasons'. Reply

derekullo USAFRet said: Chemical weapons. That has been a possibility for 100+ years. People and armies generally don't do that for 'reasons'. The 1925 Geneva Protocol and 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention both made the use of chemical and biological weapons a war-crime. Seeing as how the US likes to invade when WMD are involved, most countries don't use them. Reply

PEnns derekullo said: The 1925 Geneva Protocol and 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention both made the use of chemical and biological weapons a war-crime. Seeing as how the US likes to invade when WMD are involved, most countries don't use them. Unlike nuclear bombs, where North Korea is safe from the US but Iran is not. The difference? One of them has nuclear weapons. After the latest Epic Failure "non-war" forever war, I wouldn't be surprised if many countries want to go nuclear! Reply

Bigshrimp PEnns said: Unlike nuclear bombs, where North Korea is safe from the US but Iran is not. The difference? One of them has nuclear weapons. After the latest Epic Failure "non-war" forever war, I wouldn't be surprised if many countries want to go nuclear! Yeah. The old rules aren't really there any more. We are now living in a multi-polar world where wars are popping off left and right. Countries want to be protected so new alliances are forming outside of the normal spheres of influence. It's quite scary that nations are talking more about nukes instead of toning it down. What could go wrong? 🙁 Reply

USAFRet PEnns said: Unlike nuclear bombs, where North Korea is safe from the US but Iran is not. The difference? One of them has nuclear weapons. There is a lot more than that. But totally off topic in here. Reply

Samlebon2306 derekullo said: The 1925 Geneva Protocol and 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention both made the use of chemical and biological weapons a war-crime. Seeing as how the US likes to invade when WMD are involved, most countries don't use them. WMDs are nasty; who used them is nastier. Reply

rluker5 So a land based truck drone that can carry a literal ton of ammo and can shoot more than drones. A cheaper and more mobile version would be with an ATV. With different bullets for different applications. A plausible use for local AI. Will probably come with the same flaws. Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment