Survey reveals that 99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs — companies are racing to replace junior workers with AI, even as many executives remain uncertain

Survey reveals that 99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs — companies are racing to replace junior workers with AI, even as many executives remain uncertain

Another interesting narrative is an AI smokescreen. Reports from labor analysts like Challenger, Gray & Christmas indicate that while AI is the most frequently cited reason for job cuts, many experts believe tech CEOs are using AI as a smokescreen to mask deeper internal struggles, corrections to overhiring, and shifts toward outsourcing.

In many ways, the reports paint a picture of a corporate world charging headfirst into an AI transformation it barely understands. Companies are cutting entry-level roles that traditionally trained the next generation of workers, even as many executives privately admit they still cannot prove the technology delivers meaningful returns. If the trend continues, an entire generation could find itself shut out of the traditional career pipeline altogether — trapped in a labor market that increasingly demands experience while simultaneously eliminating the jobs designed to provide it.

Proponents argue that humanity as a whole has always emerged unscathed and better off after massive technological revolutions, despite initial fears and shake-ups. On the other hand, opponents argue that a zoomed-in view of the actual impact such changes have is necessary for ethical implementation. We recently reported that a Chinese court ruled that companies cannot replace workers simply because “AI can do a better job.”

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-23/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Etiido Uko Social Links Navigation News Contributor Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.

jp7189 I'm sorry but this is backwards. AI gives entry level an immediate level up allowing them to do higher level work for less money. I did a project recently where a subordinate was hired to help an upper level person. I created an agent where the upper level person could spew a stream of consciousness in to a mic and this thing would make structured data that was fed in to a RAG so the newbie could bother the chat bot all day without interrupting the real person. Its not perfect but it got the new person up to speed fast. Reply

yahrightthere They do have it backwards, As soon as AI is large and in charge it will be the CEO CFO board of directors and the majority of the executives that AI will realize are not need or required and will be dismissed. Reply

2Be_or_Not2Be Oh, I don't think they have it backwards. "99% of CEOs now expect AI-driven layoffs" is definitely true – CEOs do expect to drop head count. That expectation is definitely what the C-suite is thinking and banking on (pun intended). Also, the executives being dismissed when shown to be not needed is similarly laughable. They still keep their position & overly-generous compensation packages, even when it's been seen that they don't contribute near the value that their (entry level x absurdly high multiplier) salary/benefits would indicate. Elon Musk & Tesla is a prime & easy example of that. Reply

chaos215bar2 2Be_or_Not2Be said: Elon Musk & Tesla is a prime & easy example of that. Tesla isn't really an example of anything. The board is basically all in Musk's pocket, and the only thing really propping it up is its MEME stock status. Also, though, it goes without saying — eat the rich. So long as the people on top sit there, manipulating things to their benefit by destroying quality of life for everyone below them, they deserve to lose everything. Reply

SmokyBarnable jp7189 said: I'm sorry but this is backwards. AI gives entry level an immediate level up allowing them to do higher level work for less money. I did a project recently where a subordinate was hired to help an upper level person. I created an agent where the upper level person could spew a stream of consciousness in to a mic and this thing would make structured data that was fed in to a RAG so the newbie could bother the chat bot all day without interrupting the real person. It’s not perfect but it got the new person up to speed fast. “Upper level” people should not be “bothered” by less experienced people (“lower-value human capital”, from the tech overlord quoted in the piece). The AI frenzy is really good at showing capitalism for what it is. Reply

Why_Me Good. They can always learn to code . Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment