UK government tells staff to stop thanking AI chatbots

UK government tells staff to stop thanking AI chatbots

Oliver Haslam Contributing Writer Oliver Haslam has written about technology of all shapes and sizes for over 15 years, both online and in print. He's fascinated by how personal computing continues to change as tower PCs give way to foldable phones and beyond.

Neilbob What complete nonsense. It's almost like our government doesn't know its own people at all. Not only will we say thankyou to everything, we will also tell it we are sorry at every possible opportunity, whether it's our mistake or not. I do the same (in real life that is, not for some phony-baloney computerised tomfoolery). Reply

bit_user I only use polite words or phrases as part of a prompt I'm going to type, anyway. I never enter a prompt that serves no purpose other than to express gratitude. Most often, I will use these as a turn of phrase, such as "Thank you for explaining X, but I'm really more interested in Y." Remember that what you get out of a chat bot has a lot to do with what you put in. Their responses are very context-dependent, and if you want a more detailed, thoughtful, and accurate response, then use of proper grammar, punctuation, and the appropriate jargon can help. The article said: It is, of course, true that you don't need to thank a chatbot for its help, but some may choose to ignore that advice. Especially given constant claims by AI companies that their tech "could kill all humans" sooner or later. I guess this was a silly, throw-away remark. However, it's worth understanding how LLMs retain context, as that also gets to the underlying rationale for why thanking them is pointless. Once you've concluded a session, the context is discarded and the instance forgets everything about the interaction. The only possible exception to that is if part of your interaction is incorporated into training data for future models, although I'm not sure exactly if or how they do that. Even if it is, it's literally a drop in the ocean of all their training data and won't make any difference. Certainly not enough to justify the additional prompt processing. Reply

COLGeek Being polite to our future AI overlords may not be such a bad idea. /s Okay, I'll show myself to the door now. Reply

Arkitekt78 The fact this even has to be said is ridiculous. Environmental impact aside, thanking or otherwise being polite to a machine is nonsensical. That being said…. of course this would come from UK. 🤣 Reply

Kindaian No need to waste tokens with extra context: https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman Reply

greenfire33 Teach the world to be even more rude than it already is, good idea! Reply

bit_user greenfire33 said: Teach the world to be even more rude than it already is, good idea! I did have this same thought. It's the sort of thing that makes sense in the short-term and for pragmatic reasons. However, it could cast a long shadow, at a cultural level. Reply

bigdragon I predict that in a year or two there will be a flood of articles decrying the lack of pleasantries in communication. They'll all ask if interacting with AI was the motivation behind people becoming more rude without actually blaming AI. It'll be like the post-pandemic "everyone forgot how to socialize" crisis all over again! Reply

Katorga greenfire33 said: Teach the world to be even more rude than it already is, good idea! Or teach it to distinguish between humans and AI. Losing sight of the fact that you're interacting with the latter and that it has no feelings could be dangerous. Reply

me-three Kindaian said: No need to waste tokens with extra context: https://github.com/JuliusBrussee/caveman Thanks. Bookmarked. Token cost doesn't figure into local AI use, but semantic compression will help with both prompt processing & token gen speeds. OTOH loss of pragmatics makes it worthwhile only for technical or coding use, not general use. Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment