Ukraine built a $48,000 long-range drone after covertly snapping Chinese factory photos, clone destroys Russian Tu-95 bomber — attack drone has 2,000 km range,

Ukraine built a $48,000 long-range drone after covertly snapping Chinese factory photos, clone destroys Russian Tu-95 bomber — attack drone has 2,000 km range,

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.\u00a0 Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.\u00a0 ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-25/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Luke James Social Links Navigation Contributor Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.

S58_is_the_goat It’s understood that Ukrainian developers covertly photographed the Chinese production line while attending pilot training there in late 2023. I thought only china does this? 🤣 Reply

usertests S58_is_the_goat said: I thought only china does this? 🤣 Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Reply

dosmastrify Intellectual property theft oh my goodness, those poor Chinese! So unfair somebody did it back to them!! Reply

bill001g What I wonder is why they call devices like this drones rather than cruise missiles. Both these terms are not really correct since they both are small forms of small self targeting airplanes. You normally think of drones as some kind of helicopter. The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one. Reply

USAFRet bill001g said: What I wonder is why they call devices like this drones rather than cruise missiles. Both these terms are not really correct since they both are small forms of small self targeting airplanes. You normally think of drones as some kind of helicopter. The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one. And I think of the word 'drone' as a fully autonomous thing. Be it air, land, water. Which this is not. I say this as a Part 107 sUAS pilot, that despises the term 'drone'. (sUAS == small Unmanned Air System) https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap11_section_2.html Reply

Scott_Tx The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one. They didn't want to get in trouble for copying a copy of a copy. Reply

wwenze1 bill001g said: What I wonder is why they call devices like this drones rather than cruise missiles. Both these terms are not really correct since they both are small forms of small self targeting airplanes. You normally think of drones as some kind of helicopter. The author links the official article and could have taken one of the real photos rather than some fake helicopter one. Predator called. Reply

USAFRet wwenze1 said: Predator called. There is already a UAV labeled Predator. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1_Predator Reply

Vicecrow Dear god a copy of a copy who dare. Maybe now china will follow the patent Guide and sue the Ukraine Reply

gamerk316 Oh no, Chinese IP illegally stolen and put into production! Anyways… Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment