CXMT’s DDR5 RAM isn’t as performant or as consistent as SK hynix dies, early testing shows — reveals resistance to voltage scaling and inferior manual overclock

CXMT's DDR5 RAM isn't as performant or as consistent as SK hynix dies, early testing shows — reveals resistance to voltage scaling and inferior manual overclock

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he\u2019s not working, you\u2019ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-25/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Hassam Nasir Social Links Navigation Contributing Writer Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

usertests I think the real dealbreaker would be the RAM failing quickly instead of lasting decades/indefinitely like you would expect from most RAM. The issues raised could be tolerated (I have never cared about timings), but could suggest higher failure rates are also likely. Reply

drea.drechsler I think an important thing to remember is they have little to no competition at the low-price end of the market and it will stay that way for quite a while if the big three's forecasts have merit. That gives them a lot of time to improve processes and optimize designs while enjoying the opportunity to sell in volume and generate cash flow. That's an enviable position considering most high-performance semi-conductor markets have a very high bar for entry, especially when the other players are well entrenched. Reply

edzieba If the sticks meet their rated spec, then that's fine. Overclocking would be nice , but hardly an issue for the vast majority of buyers; and certainly a stick of can't-overclock RAM you can afford is preferable to a stick of theoretically-overclockable RAM that's at 10x RRP and climbing. Reply

dva852 edzieba said: If the sticks meet their rated spec, then that's fine. Overclocking would be nice , but hardly an issue for the vast majority of buyers; and certainly a stick of can't-overclock RAM you can afford is preferable to a stick of theoretically-overclockable RAM that's at 10x RRP and climbing. The concern isn't for OC, but durability. As with many Chinese products, the lesser quality is usually offset by the lower price. From reports, CXMT RAM isn't any cheaper, just more available. You're still paying the same elevated prices. Buyers can't easily tell what RAM they're getting inside their PCs/laptops/electronics. The problem may crop up months or years from now, when errors manifest from memory degradation. For DIYers who can (sometimes) decide on RAM manufacturer, there is a "peace of mind" premium, which can vary depending on overall price. I'd quantify that to be 20-30% in favor of Big 3 vs Chinese RAM. Reply

bigdragon I've never had a good experience overclocking RAM. There always seems to be some sort of compatibility issue that randomly pops up at some arbitrary point in time that causes instability. I've had better experiences sticking to the rated speed and preloaded profiles. I want the Chinese RAM to undercut the other RAM manufacturers. I want the Chinese to pull the price of RAM downward to more sane levels. Simply releasing a competing product is not enough to gain my interest. Right now it looks like they've simply released a competing product at a similar price point — not good enough. Reply

evilpaul Well, it seems to be good enough for Apple products. Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment