Intel addresses Arrow Lake blunder: ‘We needed to build back our reputation’ — says Arrow Lake Refresh’s low price a key first step, laying the groundwork for N

Intel addresses Arrow Lake blunder: 'We needed to build back our reputation' — says Arrow Lake Refresh's low price a key first step, laying the groundwork for N

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom\u2019s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors. ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-24/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Jake Roach Social Links Navigation Senior Analyst, CPUs Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

Gururu Well I think the biggest issue is that AMD realized that every website was testing with a 4090/5090. They then proceeded to make a CPU that worked extra good and only extra good with GPUS of that tier. To this day, still no one admits that. Reply

psyconz Gururu said: Well I think the biggest issue is that AMD realized that every website was testing with a 4090/5090. They then proceeded to make a CPU that worked extra good and only extra good with GPUS of that tier. To this day, still no one admits that. Oh, ok. I thought the X3Ds vastly improved 1% lows and frame drops on any GPU. Not just the high-end. Reply

King_V Gururu said: Well I think the biggest issue is that AMD realized that every website was testing with a 4090/5090. They then proceeded to make a CPU that worked extra good and only extra good with GPUS of that tier. To this day, still no one admits that. This doesn't seem in the slightest bit accurate. Care to provide evidence? Because it sounds like you're saying what amounts to "AMD made CPUs that work extra-good ONLY with GPUs that don't hold back the CPU." Reply

Gururu psyconz said: Oh, ok. I thought the X3Ds vastly improved 1% lows and frame drops on any GPU. Not just the high-end. That would be something good to know, if sites actually tested new CPUs with lower end GPUs. Reply

-Fran- Gururu said: Well I think the biggest issue is that AMD realized that every website was testing with a 4090/5090. They then proceeded to make a CPU that worked extra good and only extra good with GPUS of that tier. To this day, still no one admits that. I have hot takes, but damn. This is a very wrong hot take. — In regards to the news: good to know Robert Hallock is setting the record straight on the minds of the Intel people. They need to rebuild instead of just "fake it 'till you make it". I'll keep saying it: AMD lost a lot when they let Mr. Hallock walk away. I'm hopeful Nova Lake will be good both CPU and overall platform. Let's see some good competition, Intel. Regards. Reply

Gururu -Fran- said: I have hot takes, but damn. This is a very wrong hot take. Just admit it. Reply

Key considerations

  • Investor positioning can change fast
  • Volatility remains possible near catalysts
  • Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows

Reference reading

More on this site

Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.

Leave a Comment