Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News , or add us as a preferred source , to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.\u00a0 Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.\u00a0 ","collapsible":{"enabled":true,"maxHeight":250,"readMoreText":"Read more","readLessText":"Read less"}}), "https://slice.vanilla.futurecdn.net/13-4-24/js/authorBio.js"); } else { console.error('%c FTE ','background: #9306F9; color: #ffffff','no lazy slice hydration function available'); } Luke James Social Links Navigation Contributor Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
Zaranthos If the aim is to keep political discussions, or at least disputes out of the forums then I feel like at least the titles of articles could be more generic and just say US politicians which also makes more sense to your international readers. Blocking the imports seems pointless considering if they lose the case they'll probably just pay a huge fine or be forced to license the tech they allegedly stole. Reply
magbarn Sounds like the Patent Trolls have paid off the politicians again. It's obvious as these 4 are representing constituents that have zero skin in the game. Reply
Roland Of Gilead Zaranthos said: If the aim is to keep political discussions, or at least disputes out of the forums then I feel like at least the titles of articles could be more generic and just say US politicians which also makes more sense to your international readers. I've often thought that these particular types of articles, were almost incendiary, in how forum users might react to them. But recently, one of the mods made it very clear why these types of discussions get shut down. The forum rules existed long before the last 10 years of US or World politics did. The rules are simple. Keep politics out of it. The main reason? Well, that's obvious. There is always one or two who may not know the rules, or do know the rules and make inflammatory comments or get personal. This then garners further angry responses, which is not really healthy discussion. And then threads get shut down. As long as users comment only on the technical aspects of the articles, then that's cool and the gang! Then we (users) can enjoy the discourse and have opinion respected. When the articles are posted, they are not necessarily concerned with how forum users view the piece. However, the forum Mods, don't have control over the articles, but they do have to police them though here. I think they do a darn good job of that. Looking at the article though. This is nothing that hasn't been seen before. Patent wars have gone on for many years in the past, and will do in the future. Reply
bit_user The article said: argued in the letter that strategically important companies shouldn’t receive special treatment. Yes, but we also need to do a better job of solving the "patent troll" problem. That's making it more expensive US companies to do business and making products more expensive for US consumers. It's also stifling innovation – I can only wonder at how many startups were either killed off or never got funded, due to extortion by these firms (or concerns about such). Reply
bit_user Roland Of Gilead said: This is nothing that hasn't been seen before. Patent wars have gone on for many years in the past, and will do in the future. It's the scale and potential impact, which makes this notable. I think it'd probably be the biggest case of extortion by a patent troll we've ever seen, by far! I don't actually mind that, from a certain perspective. If it provides enough motivation to actually solve the patent troll problem, then it'd be worth the short-term pain. However, the political system is so broken right now that it'd probably just trigger a short-term "fix" and not touch the underlying problem. Reply
thestryker As much as it's notable that these lawmakers are all from a single party (to me it doesn't matter what party simply that any time this happens it deserves extra scrutiny) who the beneficiary is is a much bigger deal here. I appreciate the author of the article spelling it out so readers don't have to go look up the companies on their own: Longitude Licensing and Marlin Semiconductor, two Dublin-registered subsidiaries of patent licensing firm IPValue Management, which San Francisco private equity firm Vector Capital has owned since 2014. Once again we have a situation of a holding company that doesn't actually make anything shaking down companies. The ironic part in this case is that the company they got the patents from is still in business and assigned them to this company for the sole purpose of litigation. The rise of patent trolls has taken many shapes and this is a more recent one. Reply
Key considerations
- Investor positioning can change fast
- Volatility remains possible near catalysts
- Macro rates and liquidity can dominate flows
Reference reading
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/SPONSORED_LINK_URL
- https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/republican-lawmakers-urge-itc-to-block-imports-of-infringing-tsmc-chips-as-patent-ruling-imminent#main
- https://www.tomshardware.com/subscription
- Elon Musk's first-gen orbital data center craft spans wider than a Boeing 747 and runs an interchangeable chip payload — AI1 satellite compute payload is 120 kW
- Secretlab Atlas review: The one you’ve been waiting for
- Valve to discontinue physical Steam gift cards by the end of 2026 due to scammers — says nefarious actors continue to exploit them despite years of restrictions
- Industrial Software Leaders Build Secure, Autonomous AI Engineers With NVIDIA NemoClaw
- Logi Mobi Fold portable mouse bends in half and slides neatly into your pocket — wireless mouse has a month-long battery life
Informational only. No financial advice. Do your own research.